|
In humans,
viruses contribute to the development of about 15% of all malignancies.
Cancers of the liver and cervix make up approximately 80% of all viral
associate malignancies.
Human papillomavirus
(HPV) is seen in almost all cervical cancers. The epidemiologic evidence
that HPV is the main causative agent of cervical cancers is overwhelming.
For instance, when patients with disease are compared with population-based
controls odds ratios of >200 have been observed.
Papillomaviruses
are DNA viruses consisting of an outer protein coat which surrounds a
genome of double stranded DNA containing 8000 base pairs. HPV DNA is divided
into "early (E) and "late" (L) genes. Early genes are responsible
for DNA replication, transcriptional regulation and transformation. Late
genes control the formation of the capsid coat. Early gene products E6
and E7 encode the major transforming proteins which are capable of inducing
cell proliferation and immortalisation.
In humans,
HPV infections occur only in epithelial surfaces such as skin and mucous
membranes. Minor trauma, as occurs with sexual intercourse, allows access
to the basal cells of cervical epithelium. HPV infection involves coordinated
expression of early viral proteins in lower epithelial layers with a switch
to late gene expression as viral replication takes place leading to koilocytosis,
nuclear enlargement and, in some cases intraepithelial neoplasia. Viruses
multiply exclusively in the nuclei of infected cells.
To date over
100 types of HPV have been identified. Over 30 types infect cervical mucosa.
There are at least 15 types of HPV associated with high grade cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical carcinoma.
HPV infection
is very common in sexually active young women, with a prevalence of between
20 to 46%. The majority of these infective episodes are of short duration,
and the prevalence of high risk HPV infection drops to 3-7% in women aged
30 and over. The median duration of a new infection is 8 months. By 12
and 24 months, 70% and 91% of women are no longer infected.
The frequency
of integration of the viral genome into the host chromosome correlates
with lesion grade, being rare in CIN 1 and common in CIN 3. Viral integration
occurs in all carcinomas.
HPV and its
oncogenic genes/proteins are only capable of inducing cellular immortalisation
with transformation to the malignant phenotype requiring activation of
cellular oncogenes and/or loss of tumor suppressor genes. Several studies
have identified loss of heterozygositiy on chromosome 3p and gain of chromosome
3q with possible importance in progression from CIN to invasive disease.
There is also evidence that activation of oncogenes, such as c-Ha-ras,
is important in progression of malignancy.
Cigarette smoking,
both passive and active, has been associated with an increased risk of
CIN and invasive cervical cancer. Smoking acts in various ways including
modulating the action of the immune system resulting in a reduction of
Langerhan's cells in the cervix.
The vast majority
(over 80%) of HPV infections are transient, being cleared by the immune
system within a few months. The remaining 20% persist and go on to promote
the development of CIN. In older women, persistence and subsequent progression
to a high grade lesion are more frequent. Women with CIN who are unable
to clear a high risk HPV infection will then be at risk of further genetic
damage and progression to invasive cancer. The risk of progression of
HPV related lesions correlates with viral type.
There are three
different methods for measuring HPV in clinical specimens; non-amplification
methods (e.g. Southern blotting), signal amplification (e.g. hybrid capture),
and DNA amplification (e.g. polymerase chain reaction). In general, non-amplification
methods have fallen out of favor because of a lack of sensitivity and
specificity. Polymerase chain reaction is a flexible tool that can be
used to analyze fresh tissues specimens, paraffin embedded tissue and
cytological samples for defined parts of the HPV genome (particularly
the L1 gene). Because it is such a sensitive technique, however, polymerase
chain reaction studies are susceptible to cross contamination. At present
there are no commercially available kits for polymerase chain reaction
studies.
Hybrid capture
techniques analyze cells obtained from a brush or swab. The viral capsid
is disrupted and the released HPV DNA is bound to a specific RNA probe.
The RNA:DNA hybrid is tagged with a chemi-luminecent substrate which then
permits measurement. This is currently the only type of HPV assay commercially
available. The sensitivity of the assay is high in all populations studied.
However, as high risk HPV's are also found in low grade disease and normal
pap smears, the specificity and positive predictive value for high grade
disease and cervical cancers depends on the prevalence of HPV infection
in the population.
Screening for
high risk HPV in young sexually active women will do more harm than good
because of the high prevalence of HPV and the tendency of the the majority
of these lesions to regress. HPV screening for high risk HPV in older
women will have a higher chance of finding persistent HPV infection with
a high progression rate.
Although testing
for HPV in detection, monitoring and preventing invasive disease is important,
the ultimate aim must be eradication of high risk HPV by vaccination.
The immune system controls both the primary infection and progression.
The cell-mediated immune system seems to be more important in the prevention
of HPV infection than the humoral system.
HPV's are
viewed as infective agent of low immunogenicity; this combined with the
large number of types makes the development of vaccines a potentially
complex task. The most attractive vaccines will be those that are multivalent,
cheap, easily administered and have both prophylactic and therapeutic
potential. It should be noted that genetic engineering methods will be
required, as these viruses cannot be grown in conventional cell cultures.
Condensed from:
Kirwin et al. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer: where are we now?
Br J Obstet Gynecol 2001;108:1204-1213
|